Tag Archives: Antennas

20m Vertical Dipole

My main antenna is a full wave 40m delta loop which also matches well across 20m. While the match is good the pattern is not ideal for DX. EZNEC predicts numerous nodes and nulls and a high take off angle. I have been looking for a better 20m DX antenna while I wait to get a beam up.

At the Club’s (N1FD) recent VE session a Radio Wavz 20m Dipole was described as having good DX performance when mounted as a vertical.  At $39 including a 1:1 choke balun, I decided to try it.

I shot a rope over a branch at 65′, attached and sealed the coax, and hauled the dipole up. The coax needs to come away from the vertical at roughly 45° to minimize the coupling to the lower antenna wire.

Vertical Dipole - The Balun is hung at a right angle
Figure 1 The Balun is hung at a right angle

A paracord is attached to Balun in the opposite direction from the coax to oppose the pull of the coax and is needed to keep the antenna wire vertical as shown in Figure 1.

I used a water bottle to weigh down the lower wire which allows the antenna to move with the tree to avoid damage during high winds.  Figure-2 shows the Delta Loop and to its right the Vertical Dipole. It is difficult to see the Vertical, the green water bottle can be seen just below the center of the figure.

Delta Loop and Vertical Dipole (right)
Figure-2 Delta Loop and Vertical Dipole (right)

After the initial installation, the first step was to measure the VSWR. This can be done using the radio’s VSWR meter or an antenna analyzer. If the antenna had to be brought down to adjust its length I wanted to do it before I secured the cables and finished the installation.

The antenna analyzer measured a <1.8:1 VSWR from 13.4 MHz to 14.35 MHz. A good match over 1 MHz of bandwidth is very good. The resonate point with a 1.2:1 VSWR was at 13.9 MHz. The antenna was long which is normal “out of the package” without any tuning. With a little shortening, the match was <1.5:1 across the entire 20m band and less than 1.2:1 at band center. This is better than EZNEC predicted. The VSWR measurement includes 100′ of LMR-400 which will improve the apparent match a little. I suspect most of the improvement is from the interaction with the angled coax. It is also possible the balun isn’t a perfect 1:1 as described by Radio Wavz. The antenna has a very good match across the full band and does not need a tuner.

The vertical dipole’s noise floor was S3 (-106 dBm 3 kHz BW) which is good. I had assumed it would be much higher because it was a vertical. It is only an S unit higher than the Delta loop which measured S2 (-111 dBm 3 kHz BW).

EZNEC shows a low 10-45 degree take off angle and no NVIS capability with the top of the vertical dipole at 65′ as seen in Figure 3.

Vertical Dipole EZNEC Analysis at 65' height over poor ground
Figure 3 EZNEC Analysis at 65′ height over poor ground

Based on EZNEC it should be better for DX than for local communications.  In practice, this is the case.

For the first test, I tuned into the afternoon 20m Net. Most of the stations are within 400 miles of my QTH. The Delta Loop had a 10 dB to 20 dB SNR (signal to noise ratio) advantage at this range. An Agilent spectrum analyzer was used for these measurements.  Tuning the band I found Vancouver BC, WA, OR, CA, and Ireland. Only Ireland could be heard with the Loop. I have never heard any 20m stations in the Pacific NW  while using the loop.

The next test was to use the RBN (Reverse Beacon Network) to measure the antennas DX performance. For those unfamiliar with RBN, there are roughly 140 stations worldwide that are connected to CW Skimmers. Using CW you send a series of CQs and your call sign. If you are detected you are added to a Spot Collector which is accessible on a website or via telnet.

I transmitted on 14,037.5 when using the Loop and 14,038.5 when using the Vertical Dipole.  By using two frequencies I could tell which antenna the Spot was reporting. Also, most of the RBN stations will not respond to a second call too soon after reporting the first intercept. With a quick QSY, I could transmit on the opposite antenna without waiting. Figure 3 is a sample of the RBN Spots.

RBN Spots
Figure 3 RBN Spots

I plotted the distance to the Spots versus the reported SNR. This can be seen in Figure-4. The number of RBN nodes is limited and some of the nodes listed on the RBN website might not be available, especially during this weekends SSB contest.   Also, the band conditions will impact the range and number of stations reached.

Delta Loop vs. Vertical Dipole - SNR versus Range
Figure-4 SNR versus Range

Note that where two data points (Red and Blue) are at the same range and therefore directly above each other both antennas were spotted by the same station.   If the Spot could hear the Loop it always heard the Vertical Dipole but there were many times the Spot heard the Vertical Dipole and not the Loop.

KM3T is only 3.1 miles from my QTH. As seen in the RBN screen capture and on the plot the SNR with the Vertical is 55 dB and only 45 dB with the loop. The plot also shows an SNR=9 dB data point for the Vertical near the Y axis and no matching Blue data point for the Loop. This station was 70 miles away in MA. Both of these data points rely on ground waves and the Vertical Dipole has an advantage when compared with the Loop.

Overall beyond 1000 miles the Vertical Dipole clearly performs better than the Delta Loop and will definitely add DX to a log.

In summary when mounted high the vertical dipole retains the low take off angle of a 1/4 wave ground mounted vertical. It does not need ground radials and ground losses are reduced. It can be placed above obstructions such as a barn or house. It only needs one high support and it does not require a tuner.

It isn’t a hex beam or a yagi due to the impact of ground losses on the gain, but at $40, no tower required, it is a great antenna. It is very stealthy as well.

Hamilton, K1HMS

A Good Day To Be Doing Radio

It’s snowing at my QTH. A lot. If your QTH is within 30 miles of mine, then it’s bad for you too. Normally, I don’t mind the snow blowing. But in this instance it’s not supposed to taper off until 11 pm — meaning I…you…we…us — will likely have to go outside multiple times just to keep pace with it. Additionally, not only am I doing the driveway but the decks and sunroom roof. On days like this, I look forward to the days of being too old for it to be considered unreasonable for me to do it myself. For now, I am cursed with youth. Damn youth. So while I await my impending fate, I decided to get some fun stuff done. If you have some time, I’ve enumerated three projects I’ve been working on. Get some coffee, and enjoy!

Project 1:

The first item on my list for a while is to get my ADS-B (Automatic Dependent Surveillance Broadcast) receiver going. For those of you unfamiliar with this, I won’t delve too deeply into it, but I’ll try to provide useful information. ADS-B / Mode S is data transmitted on 1090 MHz, which is downlinked from airborne platforms communicating their telemetry such as latitude, longitude, altitude, speed, heading, ICAO number, and flight numbers (as long as they have an ADS-B transmitter on board, which most do). If you’re familiar with the website FlightAware, users who collect their own ADS-B data, can create an account with FlightAware and upload their data to feed the system helping to provide a robust and complete air-picture. There are references and links all over the web on how to achieve this, so I won’t enumerate them here but know they are out there and an easy Google search away.

To intercept these signals/broadcasts, one needs a receiver and an antenna. Of course. The receiver is easy. I bought an RTL-SDR dongle (which I saw someone brought in during the Xmas Yankee Swap — AWESOME gift) which came with two stock antennas all for $24.95. This software-defined radio is a neat little gadget. I also download the RTL-SDR library package and GnuRadio in order to actually play around with its functionality. The dongle comes with an SMA connector, so to attach any coax, you’ll need an SMA-male to an F-female connector. (Aside: The other Sunday, I intercepted some broadcast radio stations and was able to demodulate them. The structure of the signal looked just like that from the Wikipedia article about FM transmissions!! The one down side about these dongles, however, is that the lowest frequency they can reach is 24 MHz, which isn’t great for HF work. I was hoping to intercept my own transmissions from the shack, but no dice on this.)

Ham Radio Projects - RTL-SDR dongle
RTL-SDR dongle

The next bit was the antenna. Since ADS-B signals are vertically polarized, one has to of course use vertical antennas. I tried two different designs for this. The first was a colinear coaxial antenna whose plans you can view from the link. I did this a while back and found it a bit cumbersome, additionally, I wasn’t able to collect a ton of data. Many others using this antenna’s praises and I think the fault is the author for not correctly constructing it.

I then found another inexpensive design called the cantenna. This was by far the easiest of the constructions.

Ham Radio Projects - A Cantenna
Cantenna

The theory behind it was that one would take a quarter-wavelength piece of bare copper wire (from inside a spare coax lying around) which at 1090 MHz is about 69mm, and then the cutoff part of a soda can would act as the ground-plane (completing the other quarter-wavelength of the antenna). As seen from the picture, there is an F-female to an F-female connector which connects the bare copper wire to RG-6 coax cable (which is running through the PVC in the picture). And because the RG-6 was only $6.99 at Home Depot, I picked up 15 ft. for use with this antenna. You probably do not want to use coax much longer than this (and ideally shorter is better) at these frequencies due to losses in the coax.

Lastly, was to get the right software. There are a ton of software options. My ultimate goal is to run this on a RaspberryPi, setup somewhere outside, where I can open up a TCP port and pipe the data through so I can look at it from any machine connected to my LAN. To this end, I found the dump1090 distribution was an excellent choice. This dude wrote some excellent code, well-commented, and compiled in a jiffy.

With everything in place, I let her rip and began to integrate data. After about an hour, on Sunday evening, I was able to get the following results (after post-processing the data in MATLAB — eventually I’ll move this over to Python to run on the RPi)

ADS-B Flights above my QTH
ADS-B Flights above my QTH

The legend is as follows: The blue square is my QTH. The upper right square is the Lawrence Municipal Airport in North Andover, MA while the lower right square is Logan Airport. Everything else is color-coded by flight number. Even after an hour, I was able to get quite a few hits. Though not shown in this image, the farthest I’ve been able to see is 78 nmi! I’m going for the horizon limit folks!!

Project 2:

Get on the radio! Oh, man, have I been looking forward to this. Ok, so part of this is my fault. My shack isn’t complete yet. I do not have a great system of running my feed lines into my home. That’s for the Spring. For now, I have to open and close my basement window and pull the coax through. It kind of sucks. But, nevertheless, only temporary.

Other excuses: work is long and arduous now, need to hang out with my W1FEY (that’s my wife’s unofficial call-sign — I like to think I’m clever), and been doing a lot of work for the club in the form of bringing you rock-solid programming and figuring out the High-Altitude Balloon project.

Now that the excuses have been enumerated and judged, it’s time to put them aside and do some operating. I love trying to work DX. I’m not great at it, but I’m learning. Plus, every time I hop on the ol’ ICOM-7300, I have an excuse to learn how to use DXLab a little better. In fact today, I fired up the SpotCollector for the first time. I’m no expert, but I’m vectored the right way 🙂

I found that 17 and 20m worked out particularly well today. 40m was good, but I didn’t work anyone on there, and 80m was pure static during the late morning or early afternoon. (Maybe that’s just me). I only got to make 4 QSO’s but that’s 4 more than I had this morning ladies and gentlemen. They were:

I was going to work more, but then W1FEY CQ’d for me in the shack and told me to look outside. When I did, it was about time to suit up.

Project 3:

Before braving the elements, however, I wanted to use an antenna analyzer to check out my SWR’s for my Buckmaster 7-band OCF dipole. I love this antenna. I had decided that the 3 kW version was right for me since at some point I wanted to add an amp. And I did…inherited an Ameritron AL-80B from a friend’s dad who is a Silent Key.

Anyway, I noticed that 6 and 10m were conspicuously bad. As a result, I had asked Greg (W1TEN) if I could borrow his analyzer. Being the gracious gentlemen that he is, he loaned me his RigExpert AA-54. Really neat gadget and the cool thing (maybe this is standard but it was cool for me) is that with a simple USB connection, one can get results on your machine and save data for later use.

In the next set of pics, I’ll show my results for the 7 bands that the Buckmaster covers: 80, 40, 20, 17, 12, 10, 6: (It might be a bit hard to see)

80m SWR values
80m SWR values
40m SWR values
40m SWR values
20m SWR values
20m SWR values
17m SWR values
17m SWR values
12m SWR values
12m SWR values
10m SWR values
10m SWR values
6m SWR values
6m SWR values

What’s immediately obvious is that 10m is beginning to get wonky and 6m is completely gone. At least this begins to explain why I can’t hear anything on these bands. I did a bit of research online asking if anyone else encountered the same issues and some people seem to suggest that there will be a few bands that your SWR will not be ideal. With that said, however, it does seem most people have fantastic luck with these particular antennas, and so it could be user error. Perhaps something when I initially put it up? But if you’ve read this far, then maybe you have some suggestions for me…

Epilogue:

Well, thanks for reading. I hope you enjoyed a break from the snow and my somewhat lively banter kept you mildly entertained. Any comments, concerns, and questions welcomed.

Brian, AB1ZO

A Portable Satellite Station Part 4 – 2.0 Station First Contacts!

With our new 2.0 Satellite station built, tested, and packed; we were ready to try it in a portable environment.

Satellite Station Packed and Ready for Transport
Station Packed and Ready for Transport

Fortunately, the Nashua Area Radio Club had a Technician License class coming up and we thought that the new station test would be a great way for our students to learn about Amateur Radio Satellites.

Satellite Status from AMSAT Website
Satellite Status from AMSAT Website

Final preparations included checking the operational status of potential satellites on the AMSAT website. The page shown above is like a spotting cluster for LEO Satellites – it shows satellite activity as reported by HAM satellite operators. Using this information, we configured MacDoppler to track the active satellites.

Satellite Pass Predictions
Satellite Pass Predictions

Next, we used MacDoppler to generate pass predicts for the weekend of our Technical Class. We assembled this data for all of the potential satellites and color-coded the available passes to identify those which had the best chance of producing contacts.

With this done, we loaded our portable tower, antennas, and all of the rest of the gear into our pickup truck and transported it to the class site.

Satellite Station Antennas Setup Portable
Satellite Antennas Setup Portable

The first step at the class site was to unload all of our gear and move the portable tower to a suitable location. We used a compass to orient the tower to true north and leveled it. We used the weight bags that we made up to anchor the tower securely and then installed the antennas, rotator loops, and control cables. The antenna system worked out very well in the portable environment and was easy to set up.

Satellite Station Antenna Details
Satellite Antenna Details

Here’s a closer to look at the LMR-400 UF coax cables which connect the antennas to the rest of the system. The loops just behind the antennas are necessary to keep the coax from affecting the pattern of the antennas. The coax cables shown were made long enough to allow the antennas to be rotated through their full travel in the azimuth and elevation directions without binding.

Satellite Station Portable – Radio and Supporting Equipment
Satellite Station Portable – Radio and Supporting Equipment

The final step in the portable setup was to put the IC-9100 Transceiver and Supporting Equipment together in the building and check everything out. As soon as we got everything hooked up and working, we heard an ON4 station through FO-29 which was near the end of a low angle pass. A very good sign!

We took some time to fine-tune the calibration of our rotators and to check the operation of the computer controls – everything checked out fine. The video above shows MacDoppler controlling the Azimuth/Elevation rotator and the IC-9100 Transceiver during the testing.

First Contact using New 2.0 Satellite Station (via AO-85)
First Contact using New 2.0 Station (via AO-85)

With all the setup done, it was time to try to make our first contact. Fortunately, we did not have long to wait. We caught a medium angle pass of AO-85, a U/V Mode FM Easy Sat. With MacDoppler setup and tracking, we immediately heard contacts being made through AO-85. I gave a whistle and adjusted my uplink VFO until I heard my signal coming back through AO-85. I gave a quick CQ call and immediately got a response from Jonathan, NS4L in Virginia, USA! It took on a few seconds to exchange call signs and grid squares and our first contract with our new station was in the log.

Explaining Satellite Station to License Class
Explaining Satellite System to License Class

Our Technician License Class students were very interested in the station. We spent some time explaining the setup and demonstrating how it worked. We made more contacts between our class sessions using AO-85 and FO-29 (a V/U Mode Linear Transponder Satellite). Our most interesting contact was with Burt, FG8OJ in Guadeloupe through FO-29. It was great to work DX using the new station during the first time we used it.

We learned several things during our first use of the new station. First, while the 35 ft. maximum separation allowed between the antenna system and the rest of the station is adequate in many applications, the antenna system’s close proximity to the building we were in blocked passes to the west of us with this separation. We have subsequently made up an additional set of feed lines using a pair of 100 ft. long 7/8″ hardline coax cables to allow for a greater separation in portable deployments such as this one.

We were glad that we had the Heil Pro 7 Headset with us and we used it for most of our contacts. The separate speaker allowed our students to hear the contacts well and the boom microphone on the Pro 7 Headset eliminated feedback due to our own voice coming back through the satellites. We improvised a mono to stereo converter cable to connect the Heil Pro 7 Headset to one of the two speaker outputs on the IC-9100 Transceiver. This allowed the radio to drive the separate speaker and the headphones at the same time.

We were glad to have the low-noise preamps available. These were especially useful during low-angle satellite passes and the sequencing setup that we built worked well.

All in all, our first test of our new 2.0 Portable Satellite station was a success. Our license classes students enjoyed learning about Amateur Satellites and had fun along with us making contacts through a few of them. Our next goal will be to get packet modes and APRS working with our setup. We plan to do another article in this series when this part of our project is completed. Other articles in this series include:

We are planning to add larger antennas and switchable polarity to our portable satellite station in the near future. This will enable us to make contacts with Satellites and the ISS in more difficult conditions.

You may also be interested in the satellite station at our home QTH. You can read more about that here.

Fred, AB1OC

Radio Amateurs Developing Skills Worldwide