Tag Archives: HF

IF to Audio Baseband Converters for QRP SSB

Introduction

Previously [1], an RF to IF Converter was described that precedes this module in a 10-Band QRP Single Sideband (SSB) transceiver.

The IF to Audio Baseband Converter modules described in this paper both serve to convert a 9 MHz Intermediate Frequency (IF) to baseband audio upon receive and from baseband audio to a 9 MHz IF upon transmit. Only one of these modules is required, and an explanation is provided for why two have been designed and built.

The discussion in this paper will be restricted to voice transmission and reception. Digital data transmission and reception on SSB will not be discussed.

Though used in the form of a trigonometric identity in one of the derivations; discussion of the Hilbert transform has been avoided.

Circuit Design

There are circuit commonalities and differences for both circuit boards designed for this application.

Module Commonalities

Please refer to the schematic diagrams in Figures 1 and 2 for this discussion. Both IF to Audio Baseband Converters employ Bridged-T Diplexers [2][3], pi-attenuators [4], and impedance matching transformers [5] on the BFO ports of their Mini-Circuits ADE-1 mixers [6]. Both employ audio diplexers [7] on their mixer IF ports. Both employ a low noise LM723 regulator [8] in a millivolt DC power supply to unbalance a Mini-Circuits ADE-1 mixer used as a balanced modulator for the purpose of reinjecting a carrier into the up-conversion path upon transmit. The carrier is used for antenna tuning. The command to unbalance the balanced modulator is asserted from the Control Panel by depressing the push-to-talk (PTT) button on the MIC or the PTT push-button on the Control Panel once the F1 button on the Control Panel has been pressed to display Tune on the 3.2” TFT display [9].  The Control Panel and TFT display will be described in another article.

One further commonality is the dual-function use of ADE-1 mixers in both module designs. Upon receive, they serve as product detectors for demodulation of the time-dependent audio message. Upon transmit, they serve as balanced modulators to mix the time dependent audio message with the IF carrier frequency for up-conversion. Descriptions of how product detectors and a balanced modulators work are provided in later sections.

Module Differences

Please refer to the schematic diagrams in Figures 1 and 2 for this discussion. The first IF to Audio Baseband Converter module incorporates a Wes Hayward, W7ZOI, fixed gain, bidirectional, termination insensitive amplifier (TIA) [10][11][12] for both transmit and receive paths, while the second incorporates the W7ZOI termination insensitive, closed-loop, IF AGC amplifier [13][14][15] in the receive path, and an open-loop, variable gain, W7ZOI termination insensitive amplifier (TIA) [16][17] in the transmit path. The variable gain amplifier has been implemented with an open-loop, AGC amplifier to which has been added an onboard gain adjustment trimpot. This trimpot is used during module tests. It is removed during transceiver integration and is replaced by a control panel potentiometer that sets the transmitter drive level.

Figure 1. The IF to Audio Baseband Converter Schematic Diagram. This module employs a fixed gain W7ZOI bidirectional, termination insensitive amplifier (TIA) for receive down-conversion from 9 MHz IF to audio baseband and from audio baseband to 9 MHz IF for transmit up-conversion. A low-noise LM723 voltage regulator is part of a millivolt, DC, onboard power supply. Its purpose is to unbalance the ADE-1 balanced modulator so that a carrier may be injected during transmit for antenna tuning.

Figure 2. The IF to Audio Baseband Converter with Receive AGC Schematic Diagram. This module employs a W7ZOI Termination Insensitive Amplifier (TIA) with closed loop AGC for receive down-conversion from 9 MHz IF to audio baseband. A W7ZOI Termination Insensitive Amplifier (TIA) with open loop AGC is used for transmit up-conversion. A low-noise LM723 voltage regulator is part of a millivolt, DC, onboard power supply. Its purpose is to unbalance the ADE-1 balanced modulator so that a carrier may be injected during transmit for antenna tuning.

What is a Balanced Modulator?

In the time domain a SSB signal containing the message is generated by multiplying a time dependent audio message signal by a time dependent IF carrier signal in a mixer used as what is called a balanced modulator. The audio message information is injected into the IF port of the balanced modulator while a local oscillator (LO) signal is injected into the LO port of the balanced modulator. What results is a double sideband suppressed carrier signal in the time domain. There are other methods used to produce SSB signals, but we will limit this discussion to the use of a double balanced mixer for this example. The problem could also be described in the frequency domain, but that solution will not be presented at this time. For sake of example, we neglect higher order, odd harmonics of the LO signal because the LO signal is a square wave. Also, for simplicity, we will neglect the phase terms that accompany each of the signals.

In order to achieve the best possible carrier cancellation in a double balanced mixer used as a balanced modulator, care must be taken to ensure that all of the mixer ports have been terminated in 50-ohms. It is also essential to drive the mixer at its required signal level. Once these requirements have been implemented in the design, the signal leaving the balanced modulator will consist of two sidebands, an upper one and a lower one. The carrier will have been greatly suppressed.

The time dependent, equation for the output of a balanced modulator may be derived from two expressions; the first,

is the time-dependent audio message information that is injected into the IF port of the balanced modulator,

where:

It is important to remember that the time-dependent audio message signal may or may not be a single sinusoidal frequency. For example, voice is quite complex and contains many frequency components. For simplicity here, though, it is defined as a single frequency.

while the second,

is the time-dependent IF carrier signal that is injected into the LO port of the balanced modulator,

where:

For this discussion the assumption is made that the IF carrier signal frequency is much greater than the audio message signal frequency. Multiplying the audio message with the IF carrier, we have for the double sideband suppressed carrier (DSB-SC),

Substituting, we have,

We may recall from trigonometry that the product of two cosines is just,

Substituting, we have,

This equation is comprised of two terms, where the first term,

is called the upper sideband because the output frequency is higher than the carrier.

We know from trigonometry that,

Thus, for the upper sideband, we have,

where the minus sign is correct and is the result of trigonometry.

The second of the two terms is,

which is called the lower sideband because the output frequency is lower than the carrier.

We know from trigonometry that,

Thus, for the lower sideband, we have,

where the plus sign is correct and is the result of trigonometry.

These two sideband equations may be combined in compact form as the double sideband suppressed carrier (DSB-SC) signal,

where the minus sign represents the upper sideband, and the plus sign represents the lower sideband, however counterintuitive it may seem.

One might ask how one of the two sidebands is selected for transmission? The answer comes in the form of a very narrow (of the order of 2.6 kHz wide) crystal bandpass filter [10] centered somewhere near 9 MHz. If upper sideband transmission is desired, that frequency is shifted downward so that the upper sideband sits in the passband of the crystal bandpass filter. If lower sideband transmission is desired, that frequency is shifted upward so that the lower sideband sits in the passband of the crystal bandpass filter. This is accomplished by shifting the LO frequency to the balanced modulator by a few kHz.

All of this requires some a priori knowledge of where the center frequency of the crystal bandpass filter is located. Once known, the audio message information may be shifted so that it is centered in the crystal bandpass filter passband for either sideband.

What is a Product Detector?

In this context a product detector is a demodulator used to recover audio message information from a SSB voice message signal. If a double balanced mixer is used as a product detector, a SSB signal enters the RF port of the mixer while a local oscillator beat frequency oscillator (BFO) signal is injected into the local oscillator (LO) port. When the listener tunes the receiver BFO frequency close to the carrier frequency that was removed prior to SSB transmission, the audio message information becomes intelligible to the listener. This presupposes that the signal is transmitted on upper or lower sideband in accordance with conventions used on the ham bands. It is important that hams work to the same conventions everywhere on the planet or the system will break down.

Product detection may also be described in a few trigonometric equations. This time we use the same double balanced mixer as a product detector. After passing through our crystal bandpass filter, the upper or lower sideband signal is sent to the RF input of the product detector. A BFO signal is injected into the product detector LO port to match the frequency of the carrier that originally generated the SSB transmission. Once tuned to the correct sideband, the output of the product detector passes through a lowpass filter to remove all of the remaining high frequency components, thereby recovering the message audio.

In the previous section it was shown that the DSB-SC signal may be represented by,

This expression contains the message on both of the sidebands, where the carrier has been suppressed.

If we want to recover the voice audio message information, we select the appropriate sideband that has been transmitted based upon the ham band in use.

In order to simplify the expression appearing above without any discussion of the Hilbert transform, let’s make some simple trig substitutions, and we will dispense with any of the constant terms out front. Let’s represent the time-dependent voice audio message in this way,

Furthermore, we can use a trigonometric identity,

Transformations of this type are quite common in communication theory, but we will not dwell upon them.

These two quantities having been defined; we may write our equation for DSB-SC in this way,

Now, suppose that we multiply the preceding expression by the same carrier frequency, presumably in the product detector, and we have for the carrier,

where c(t) is the BFO carrier signal that matches the one suppressed during message transmission.

Then, having performed this operation; we will have recovered the modulating time-dependent voice audio message, where,

and where R(t) represents the recovered, time-dependent message prior to filtering.

Multiplying through, we have,

Again, invoking trigonometric substitutions,

and,

which yield,

This may be rewritten to show the carrier frequency instead of the angular frequency,

The first term contains the time dependent audio message information while the last two terms contain the carrier frequency. The carrier frequency terms may be removed by lowpass filtering after the product detector with an audio diplexer to recover the time-dependent audio message.

Why Two IF to Audio Baseband Converters?

The reason that two discrete IF to Audio Baseband Converters were designed and built is twofold.

First, I wanted to fast-track the SSB radio integration task if trouble was encountered with the IF AGC circuit. This turned out to be fortuitous, and that is exactly what occurred. It took some time to de-bug the circuit.

Second, I wanted to be able to compare receiver performance with, and without, IF AGC. Differences in receiver dynamic range and sensitivity were anticipated.

Construction

Both circuit cards were designed on EasyEDA [18] CAD software that is available for free download and use. PCB fabrication was completed from transmitted Gerber files by JLCPCB [19] in Hong Kong. Turnaround time was 10-days. In order to reduce the number of via holes on the circuit boards, 4-layers were adopted. The top layer consists of ground plane. Vertical SMA RF connectors on the surface of the boards put the ground plane to good use. DC and signal connections to the amplifiers and mixers are made via pin headers and DuPont wires as are visible in Figures 3 and 4. Each of the modules derives its input from a crystal bandpass filter [20] that has sharp skirt selectivity.

Several features are visible on each of the circuit boards:

·        W7ZOI Termination Insensitive Amplifiers (TIAs) in use on both boards to present 50-ohms to the balanced modulator RF port on transmit and the product detector RF port on receive

·        A Mini-Circuits ADE-1 mixer functions as a balanced modulator upon transmit and a product detector upon receive

·        A transformer on the BFO port to transform the impedance level of the SI5351 Clock Generator to 50-ohms

·        A pi-attenuator to adjust the BFO drive level to that required by the mixer

·        An LO diplexer is used to present 50-ohms to the mixer LO port

·        An audio diplexer is used on the mixer IF port to present a 50-ohm load to the IF port, and to filter out any RF appearing on the IF port upon receive so that the audio message may be recovered

·        A low noise LM723 voltage regulator is used in a millivolt power supply configuration so that the balanced modulator may be unbalanced for carrier injection

Figure 3. IF to Audio Baseband Converter without AGC. The IF to Audio Baseband Converter module without AGC consists of a W7ZOI bidirectional, termination insensitive amplifier (TIA) to the left, a Mini-Circuits ADE-1, +7 dBm level mixer at the center, and a millivolt power supply to the right. The mixer serves as a product detector for receive and a balanced modulator for transmit. The relay at the lower right switches 100 mV onto a 50 ohm termination at the IF port of the mixer to unbalance it. This serves to inject a carrier into the transmit path so that the antenna may be tuned to resonance. An audio diplexer is visible on the IF port. This serves to terminate the IF port in 50 ohms while providing a lowpass filter to pass the receiver audio. There is a transformer visible on the LO port of the mixer that serves to match the 76 ohm output impedance of the SI5351 clock generator used as the beat frequency oscillator (BFO) to the 50 ohms required by the LO diplexer and the ADE-1 mixer LO port. A pi-attenuator is provided between the transformer and the diplexer to drop the SI5351 level to +7 dBm.

Figure 4. IF to Audio Baseband Converter with AGC. A W7ZOI termination insensitive amplifier (TIA) is visible to the left. It is used during receive only, and it operates with closed loop AGC. The AGC output voltage also serves as the S-meter signal that is routed to the Arduino S-meter input for display on a 3.2” TFT display. Another W7ZOI termination insensitive amplifier (TIA), set to fixed gain for test, is visible second from the left. It is constructed from an amplifier that has an open loop AGC input. A potentiometer on the AGC port is used to set a fixed transmitter drive level. The Mini-Circuits ADE-1 mixer, second from the right is used as a product detector on receive and a balanced modulator on transmit. The circuitry to the far right generates 100 mV that is applied to the 50 ohm termination on the IF port of the mixer. This serves to inject a carrier into the transmit chain so that the antenna may be tuned to resonance.  The relay in the photo switches the 100 mV onto the 50 ohm termination on the IF port of the mixer. A transformer is visible on the LO port that transforms the 76 ohm output impedance of the SI5351 clock generator to the 50-ohms required on the mixer LO port. A pi-attenuator is located between the transformer and the LO diplexer to lower the signal level to that required by the +7 dBm mixer. An audio diplexer and lowpass filter provides a 50 ohm match to the IF port while allowing only audio to pass.

References

[1] Blustine, Martin, K1FQL, An RF to IF Converter for QRP SSB Transceiver Use, N1FD, 4 August 2025. https://www.n1fd.org/2025/08/04/transverter/

[2] Ibid.

[3] https://www.changpuak.ch/electronics/calc_16a.php

[4] https://leleivre.com/rf_pipad.html

[5] Blustine, Martin, K1FQL, Impedance Matching to an 8-Pole Quasi-Equiripple (QER) Crystal Bandpass Filter, N1FD, 21 May 2024. https://www.n1fd.org/2024/05/21/crystal-filter/

[6] Mini-Circuits, https://www.minicircuits.com/WebStore/dashboard.html?model=ADE-1

[7] Lewallen, Roy, W7EL, An Optimized QRP Transceiver for 7 MHz, ARRL, https://www.arrl.org/files/file/Technology/tis/info/pdf/93hb3037.pdf

[8] Texas Instruments, https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/lm723.pdf

[9] Adafruit, https://www.adafruit.com/product/1743?srsltid=AfmBOopGfznYc8RKuumddbQzWwXY_d1ByQd07CqiPAZ_xqBDg2jOWuzv

[10] Hayward, Wes, W7ZOI and Kopski, Bob, K3NHI, A Termination Insensitive Amplifier for Bidirectional Transceivers, 26 June 2009. https://w7zoi.net/bidirectional_matched_amplifier.pdf

[11] Land Boards, A Termination Insensitive Amplifier for Bidirectional Transceivers. https://land-boards.com/blwiki/index.php?title=A_Termination_Insensitive_Amplifier_for_Bidirectional_Transceivers

[12] Tindie, A Termination Insensitive Amplifier for Bidirectional Transceivers. https://www.tindie.com/products/land_boards/termination-insensitive-rf-amplifier/

[13] Hayward, Wes, W7ZOI and Damm, Jeff, WA7MLH, The Hybrid Cascode – A General Purpose AGC IF Amplifier, QST, December 2007. https://www.ka7exm.net/hycas/hycas_200712_qst.pdf

[14] Hayward, Wes, W7ZOI, Regarding Circuit Boards for the Hybrid Cascode General Purpose IF AGC Amplifier. https://w7zoi.net/hycas-pcb.html

[15] Carney, Todd, K7TFC, Mostly DIY RF, https://mostlydiyrf.com/hycas/

[16] Hayward, Wes, W7ZOI, Adding AGC to a Termination Insensitive Amplifier, 27 October 2021. https://w7zoi.net/tia+agc.pdf

[17] Carney, Todd, Mostly DIY RF, TIA-AGC RF Amplifier. https://mostlydiyrf.com/tia-agc/

[18] EasyEDA. https://easyeda.com/

[19] JLCPCB. https://jlcpcb.com/?from=VGBNA&utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=13059631621&utm_content=581194145188&utm_term=b_jlcpcb&adgroupid=118955305341&utm_network=g_&gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=13059631621&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIssG71-mZjwMVBjIIBR1NEDo_EAAYASAAEgKrzvD_BwE

[20] Blustine, Martin, K1FQL, Impedance Matching to an 8-Pole Quasi-Equiripple (QER) Crystal Bandpass Filter. Op. cit. https://www.n1fd.org/2024/05/21/crystal-filter/

Disclaimers:

The circuits included on these PCBs were sourced from a number of authors. This is a somewhat advanced and expensive project, and some prior design and construction experience is recommended before taking on a project of this magnitude. These circuit designs are provided for informational and educational purposes only and are supplied “as is” and without warranties of any kind, express, implied, or statutory. No representations or warranties are made regarding the accuracy, adequacy, completeness, legality, reliability, or usefulness of this information, either in isolation or in the aggregate. These circuit designs may contain links to or information based on external sources or third-party content. Endorsement and responsibility for the accuracy or reliability of such third-party information or for the content of any linked websites are not taken.

When did WWV Move to Colorado?

During our weekly Sunday night VHF net, a question arose about the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s (NIST) time and frequency station, WWV. Net Control asked, “When did WWV move to Colorado?” While a few of us could answer, it became clear that many of the newer hams didn’t know much about the WWV station.

Myself, being a ham from Boulder, Colorado and now living in Nashua, New Hampshire, I saw this as a great opportunity to share information I’ve gathered over the years, both about WWV’s operations in Fort Collins, Colorado, and its move from Maryland in 1966.

WWV Site - Fort Collins, CO
WWV Site – Fort Collins, CO

WWV is considered one of the oldest continuously operating radio stations in the United States. It was first established in 1919 by the National Bureau of Standards (now NIST) and originally broadcasted from Washington, D.C. Its primary purpose has always been to transmit accurate time and frequency signals, which it continues to do today from its Fort Collins, Colorado facility. WWV’s long history of broadcasting time signals makes it a significant part of radio history in the U.S.

Boulder, Colorado, is home to the NIST (formerly the National Bureau of Standards, or NBS) Atomic Clock, which serves as the time and frequency standard for the United States and many other countries around the world. I’ve had the opportunity to view the Atomic Clock “in person” at the NIST Laboratory.

The NIST atomic clocks use cesium atoms to keep incredibly precise time. Here’s a simplified explanation of the process:

  1. Cesium Atoms: The atomic clock relies on the natural oscillation of cesium atoms. Cesium atoms absorb and release energy at a very consistent frequency when they transition between two energy levels.
  2. Microwave Frequency: The clock generates microwaves that are tuned to match the exact frequency of the cesium atoms’ oscillation. The frequency at which cesium atoms oscillate is exactly 9,192,631,770 cycles per second.
  3. Tuning to Maximize Accuracy: The atomic clock continuously adjusts the microwave frequency to ensure it matches the cesium atom’s resonance as precisely as possible.
  4. Counting Seconds: By counting these highly accurate oscillations, the clock measures time. One second is defined as exactly 9,192,631,770 oscillations of the cesium atom.
  5. Disseminating the Time: NIST broadcasts the official time using radio signals (via stations like WWV), the internet (through NIST’s network time protocol, or NTP), and satellite systems. These signals help synchronize clocks around the world.

NIST’s time standard is crucial for GPS systems, telecommunications, scientific research, and other industries that require precise timekeeping.

In 2013, when I was serving as the ARRL Colorado Section Manager, we hosted the Rocky Mountain Division Convention (Hamcon Colorado) in Estes Park, Colorado. Given its proximity to the WWV radio complex in Fort Collins, our committee thought it would be a great opportunity to arrange a tour for interested hams. Since WWV is a secure government facility, we needed special permission. The WWV Chief Engineer, who was also a ham, informed us that they had never conducted a tour before and it might be impossible, but he would ask. To our surprise, permission was granted with some necessary security measures in place. Interest in the tour was high, and we chartered a school bus to take a large group of hams to the facility.

10 KW - 5 MHz WWV transmitter
10 KW – 5 MHz WWV transmitter

The engineers at WWV went above and beyond, providing a comprehensive tour of the facility that included fascinating historical devices. We were able to visit the antenna sites and transmitters, with detailed explanations of their operations.

Historically, amateur radio operators played a key role in the technical development of the atomic clock and the WWV radio stations from their earliest days. Given that the atomic clock is housed in Boulder, CO, many members of the Boulder Amateur Radio Club (BARC) were among those who contributed to its development and advised on the WWV operations over the years.

Yardley Beers, W0JF
Yardley Beers, W0JF

ne of the more notable BARC members was Yardley Beers, WØJF (formerly WØEXS and W3 AWH), who earned his MS in Nuclear Physics in 1937 and a Ph.D. in 1941 from Princeton University, where Einstein was in residence at the time. Beers was a pioneering scientist who first utilized cesium as the core of the aforementioned time standard oscillator. He was a dear friend whose boundless curiosity, humor, and deep expertise in all things radio-related made him a wealth of knowledge for our club.

At 0000 GMT on December 1, 1966, the veteran time and frequency station WWV in Greenbelt, Maryland, shut down permanently. Almost simultaneously, a new station with the same call letters and services began broadcasting from Fort Collins, Colorado. The decision to construct the new station and relocate was driven by several factors, primarily the obsolescence of the old facility and significant maintenance challenges.

WWV 15-meter antennas
WWV 15-meter antennas

 

In contrast, the new station utilizes the latest transmitter designs, offering significantly more efficient operation. The setup also provides greater flexibility, as the transmitters consist of identical units—except for some higher-powered transmitters, which include an additional amplifier stage—that can be tuned to any frequency. At the old station, only a few of the eight transmitters were identical. Unlike the old transmitters, the new ones apply modulation at low levels, with all subsequent stages maintaining precise linearity. This allows for a wide range of modulation options, including AM or single sideband, with either sideband and any desired degree of carrier suppression. These features mirror those found in modern amateur radio transmitters.

Lastly, the move brings the benefit of administrative efficiency. WWV is now co-located with two other NBS standard frequency and time stations, WWVB (60 kHz) and WWVL (20 kHz), at the same site. Additionally, it is more convenient to synchronize the station with the NIST atomic standards, which are based in nearby Boulder, Colorado.

WWVH began operation on November 22, 1948, at Kihei on the island of Maui, in the then

territory of Hawaii (Hawaii was not granted statehood until 1959). The original station

broadcasts a low-power signal on 5, 10, and 15 MHz. As it does today, the program schedule

of WWVH closely follows the format of WWV. However, voice announcements of time

weren’t added to the WWVH broadcast until July 1964. In July 1971, the station moved to its current location, a 30-acre (12-hectare) site near Kekaha on the Island of Kauai, Hawaii.

Today, the methods for calibrating frequency, synchronizing time, and assessing propagation have evolved significantly due to advances in technology, though some traditional methods (like using WWV) are still in use. Here’s a comparison of how these tasks were done in the past versus how they are typically done today:

1. Frequency Calibration

Before (Using WWV and Manual Tools):

  • WWV Broadcast: Operators tuned their radios to the exact frequencies broadcast by WWV (e.g., 5, 10, or 15 MHz) to verify or adjust their frequency dials
  • .Signal Comparison: Operators might use frequency counters or calibrate their equipment using signal generators. By manually adjusting their radio to match the WWV signal, they ensured their equipment was tuned correctly.
  • Crystal Oscillators: Some radios used quartz crystal oscillators that needed periodic manual adjustments to maintain frequency stability.

Today (Using GPS, Software, and SDRs):

  • GPS Disciplined Oscillators (GPSDO): Modern radio equipment can be calibrated with GPS, which provides ultra-precise time and frequency data directly from satellites. GPSDOs lock the radio’s oscillator to the exact frequency provided by GPS signals.
  • Software-Defined Radios (SDRs): SDRs can automatically lock to known reference frequencies or signals, often bypassing the need for manual calibration.
  • Digital Frequency Counters: High-precision digital frequency counters, often built into modern equipment, can accurately verify a station’s frequency without the need for an external signal like WWV.

2. Time Synchronization

Before (Using WWV or Manual Clocks):

  • WWV Time Signals: Operators would listen to WWV’s hourly time announcements and manually synchronize their clocks to the audio ticks or the minute mark. This ensured they had the correct Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) for logging contacts.
  • Mechanical or Quartz Clocks: Station clocks were either mechanical or quartz-based, requiring manual adjustments for drift.

Today (Using NTP and GPS):

  • Network Time Protocol (NTP): Computers, logging software, and transceivers are often synced to the Internet time servers using NTP, which automatically keeps time to within milliseconds of UTC. Many hams now use computers with built-in NTP syncing for contest logging and communication accuracy.
  • GPS Time: GPS provides highly accurate time synchronization. Many modern radios or station computers are connected to GPS receivers that provide time directly to within a fraction of a second of UTC.
  • Atomic Clocks: Although not widespread in amateur radio, some operators use atomic clock-based devices for extreme precision in timekeeping, often integrated with GPS.

3. Propagation Monitoring

Before (Using WWV and Beacons):

  • WWV Propagation Monitoring: Hams listened to WWV signals on different frequencies (2.5, 5, 10, 15, and 20 MHz). The strength of the signal provided a rough estimate of how well certain bands were propagating, helping operators decide which frequencies to use.
  • Beacon Stations: Operators tuned to beacon stations operating on different frequencies around the world. By monitoring when these signals were heard, they could get a sense of global propagation conditions.
  • Sunspot Numbers: Many hams used published sunspot data and predictions to estimate the effectiveness of different HF bands.

Today (Using Online Tools and Real-Time Data):

  • Real-Time Propagation Maps: Websites and apps like PSKReporter, DXMAPS, Reverse Beacon Network (RBN), and WSPRnet provide real-time data on where signals are being received and which bands are open. These platforms track signal reports and provide a visual display of current propagation conditions.
  • Solar and Geomagnetic Data: Many hams now use online services that provide real-time solar flux, geomagnetic indices, and space weather data. Websites like Space Weather Prediction Center (SWPC) offer detailed insights into how solar activity is affecting the ionosphere.
  • Cluster Networks: DX cluster networks provide real-time information on stations spotted around the world, giving hams direct feedback on current band conditions.
  • Software Tools: Advanced propagation software like VOACAP or HamCAP allows operators to model HF propagation based on real-time data, including solar activity, time of day, and location.

Summary of Key Differences:

While older methods like WWV are still valuable, modern technology has automated and refined many of these tasks, making it easier and more precise for amateur radio operators to ensure their equipment is accurate and their communication effective.

NISTTime and Frequency Services

Field Day 2024 Results

The kids’ action for Field Day was probably the most impressive. They were running CQ pileups on 40M.
They had 199 contacts. It was fun to watch and hear.  AND hats off to the HAM’s who worked the kids, they had amazing patience.

We were planning to be a 4A station this year, but we had a key individual drop late in the schedule and the weather was another reason, they were forecasting 93⁰ and 38% chance of thunderstorms. So, we reverted back to last year’s 3A configuration. That meant 1 less tower to be raised.

DCIM100MEDIADJI_0516.JPG

Our weather turned out to not be as hot as predicted but it was a wet field day.  Not just from rain, over night the security team had a rude awaking at around 3AM as the sprinkler system came on.  We had 2 tents positioned over 2 sprinkler heads and yes these were the tents the security team had decided to sleep in.  No damage other than lack of sleep.

Kids had a great time with the FOX Hunt.  They wanted to do it again on Sunday different location of course.

Field Day teardown is always faster than the setup and always under the threat of thunderstorms arriving later.  The Kids also participated in teardown.

Yea Yea, but how did we do it?

We had 20 operators at Field Day, the same as last year, and had 142 fewer contacts from last year, BUT because of the kids, we outscored 2023 Field Day by 552 points.  We had all ARRL SECTIONS except East Bay, California & Southern New Jersey (GOTA got SNJ).  We achieved our goal of field day being a learning experience (like don’t put the tents on the sprinklers)

Fun Facts 😉:

  • John Halbert (W1SMN) had the most contacts @ 215 and the most points at 215. Jack (WM0G) had second with 169 contacts but third in points.
  • Matt Seaver AC1NB came in second in points, with 104 contact and 208 points (FT8 & FT4)
  • The best per hour was W1TKO, with 52 contacts in an hour!!!!  Outstanding
  • Peter KC1FNF had both the First Contact and the Last Contact.
  • The first contact was Australia by Matt, AC1NB
    Second furthest was New Zealand by Peter, KC1FNF

We only had 24 CW Contacts. We need more CW operators to come out to man a position. It’s worth 2 points for each CW contact. We made no contacts on 80M.

We had 32 calls that were not counted as contacts; 10 were Duplicates. That means we had 22 bad calls where the database failed to list Class, Section, or both. All were FT8, and it was because the other station was not set up for Field Day. Overall, we had 5,852 points for our 2024 score.

We received a $20 donation from Norm Jackson (W1CIP). [email protected]  So, if you should see him please thank him.

Bonuses:

  • Social Media: 100 bonus points – Thank you John
  • Media Publicity: 100 bonus points –  Thank you John and team
  • Public Location: 100 bonus points
  • Set up at Hudson Memorial School
  • Public Information Table: 100 bonus points – Thank you, Brian for the INFO boards
  • W1AW Bulletin: 100 bonus points – Thank you, Dave (copied as CW)
  • Educational activity bonus: 100- bonus points – Thank you, Elaina & Frank
  • Site Visitation by a representative of an agency: 100-point bonus – Thank you Frank’s Daughter Got a Fire Captain to stop by
  • Safety Officer Bonus: A 100-point bonus – Thank you Lee
  • Web submission: A 50-point bonus – Thank You Brian

GOTA

  • Any completed contacts made by an operator at the GOTA station are worth five (5) bonus points.  We had 200 QSO’s for 1000 points
  • GOTA station is supervised full-time by a GOTA Coach 100 Points, thanks you to Lee KC1HKJ and Rui W1RUI, and Brian W1XMM
  • Field Day Youth Participation – A 20-point bonus (maximum of 100) for each participant age 18 or younger at your Field Day operation who completes at least one QSO.  We had eight kids all together.

We missed out on the following bonuses:

  • Satellite QSO – Next year we need a Elmer to help us
  • Message Origination to Section Manage – Need to set a schedule to a local ham
  • Message Handling 100 points (ten messages) – Need to set a schedule to a local ham
  • Alternate Power – Need a large capacity battery to make five contacts
  • Site Visitation by an elected governmental official – Need to personally ask someone who is elected to stop by

Additionally, thanks are needed for the  team:

The worst thing that happened:  No, it’s not that someone got hurt.  Someone packed up the coffee pit.  Yes, with coffee and coffee grounds still in it!  I don’t drink coffee.  It reminds me of a funny story back in the Army when I was on MIDS (11 PM to 8 AM).  A sergeant told me to find something to do.  Well, the coffee pot looked really nasty.  (They later told me that it was well seasoned) and I cleaned it.  The whole GI cleaning is done with a scouring pad and Comet cleanser.  It looked brand new by the time I was done.  It seems that was the wrong thing to do, because they had to go out and buy a new coffeepot, you know a 100 cup Army sized coffeepot.   So, don’t blame me for the flavor of your coffee next year because you left me to clean it……  Did I mention that I don’t drink coffee?  -Brian

After Action Reports
2023 After Action Report.  Looking to see how well we completed previous action items.
1.    Focus on staffing and working low bands as a means of improving
readiness on those bands
2.    Recruit more CW ops
3.    Improve management of operator resources to most effective
bands / modes
4.    Increase member engagement in “educational” activities (i.e.
Satellite operation, messaging, etc)
5.    Reinforce “CTRL-O”ettiquite .
6.    Focus FT8 on bands/times with poor propagation only.
7.    Improve on how we manage the station computers–
standardization, recovery, management
8.    Increase operator knowledge of equipment
9.    Prepare more thoroughly for inclement / severe weather.
10.  Improve GOTA station experience
11.  Having a CW team leader, GOTA Leader
12.  They used mode titles for towers verse our band tents
13.  Work Satellites
14.  Get the Scouts involved

After Action Report 2024
1.    FIX POD to have WWW access
2.    Fuel pod suction system.
a.       Recommend making the pods single lines to single
generator, single point failure
3.    Have both trailers side by side to move stuff once
4.    Need to have food put in coolers rather than being left out to
possible spoil.
5.    Need to request that the sprinklers are off.
a.  Possible shut off water valve rather than just computer
control
b.       Mark the sprinklers and don’t put tents on sprinklers.
6.    Remove the small steel cable from Tower Kit’s
7.    PR / Instagram tags of field day, and or something else.
8.    Power Strips need to be RFI/EMI filtered.  6M station kept going
down and required power cycle of power supply to come back.
Some stations also complained of noise.
9.    Need a better way to have folks sign in.
10.  Need to have a better way for the GOTA station QSO’s logs.
Lost a lot of the kids hard work because of not time or
frequency on QSO’s

Radio Amateurs Developing Skills Worldwide